Monday, February 25, 2019
NT government Fin
It is prudent at this juncture to define the northerly territorial dominion as a air of introduction. The Yankee territory (NT) is much of a political territory, which sh ars geographical location with north Australia. This is the main characteristic feature. However thither be several salmagundis In terms of the rise-disposed and heathenish orientation within the geographical region of north Australia.The blue territory exists as a self- presidency territory. However the territory derives its decline to g overn from the national parliament. This means that the supreme authority is still the federal official parliament. If follows that the decision reached at the Yankee territory legislative assembly is typesetters case to the approval of the federal parliament. This happens to be what separates the self-governing territory of the Yankee district from the rest of Australia. The political structure in the sizeabler Australia is such that the states argon sovereign and unless come together under the federal authorities.The blue territory self-political science act of 1978 gave a new status to the northern territory. In this act the northern territory was granted authority that could sponsor it endure a self-autonomous entity, usurping a few roles from the normalwealth. A few of responsibilities and duties ab initio carried out by the common wealth were transferred to the northern territory. A superficial glance at the territory and comparison with the separate states indicates almost a complete similarity. However, the territory suits a shoulder below the rest in terms of authority and the structure of the government. It leaves more towards being a self-autonomous territory as opposed to the usual states in the common wealth.Although all the states in the common wealth are independent and value sovereignty, the 1978 act to self-given presents the biggest difference between these and the northern territory. The government in northern t erritory laughingstock misrepresent and enforce its own laws, but should the federal government deficiency to overturn or override it, it nominate achieve this through the parliament. An manikin in point is the euthanasia legislation passed by northern treaty but overridden by the national parliament ().In the place of a governor, the northern territory has administrator who wields executives power. He leads with the help of an executive council. The territory as well has its representative in the federal legislature comprising of cardinal representatives and two tribe in the senate.The territory has a legislative assembly consisting of members that are elected to speaker and the member of the executive council or the ministers. The northern territory in resembling manner has local governments and authorities with some full administrative powers in Darwin, the weapons-grade city as well as in other large towns, these administrative centers provide essential services to the tidy sum ranging from housing to wellness among others. Union territories take over a fully-fledged legal system with the Supreme Court as the highest court in the land.There is a chief minister who leads the self-autonomous government art object the premier leads the state government. These two are appointed by the administrator who in turn is appointed by the governor-general of Australia.In the national scene, the parliament is make up of the senate and the house of representative it deals with matters affecting almost all the states like foreign affair or the issue of protecting the nation as is the case in the United States. The territorys representation in these two organs is a bit lower to make up for special status that it enjoys with an autonomous government.Broad officeThe northern territory government is charged with the function of managing the affairs of the territory save for those that are national in nature like the world heritage areas and national parks dictated within the territory (Strelein L (2000). This is done to avoid conflicts between the two levels of government. Areas that fall within the northern territory government share of responsibility include but not limited to education, health, and issues, administrative matters, infrastructure and local government. In locate to perform these duties the NT government receives funds from the federal government.Relationship with federal governmentIt is clear that the two levels of government are mutually dependent. The federal government looks up to the territorial government to facilitate the implementation of laws and policies. Additionally the federal government expects to receive money remitted by the territorial government in order to reach its own objectives. On the other hand, the territorial government receives funds from the federal government to meet its budgetary obligations. This has for long condemnation been a subject of much debate and controversy not only in the n orthern territory but also elsewhere in Australia and also in the world.The federal government in Australia has to perform a balancing act in order to achieve some tolerant of equity. Equitable distribution of resources is a thorny issue here. This balance is principal(prenominal) for stability of any nation. An example of inequality is between the State of calcium in the US and the Mississippi between which a huge scotch disparity exists. There has existed a general discontent specially from richer states in the delegacy the national government distributes money contributed by these states.One of the important areas of increment that lie within the responsibility of the NT government is ethnic organic evolution. Culture is a very important composite of any bon ton. However, in the modern world, rarely would any society share in all aspects of a common culture. According to Martin C (1995), this is mainly because of the historical backgrounds that are as vary as the trends of the modern lifestyle. It is therefore important to understand the basics of cultural dynamics before any form of cultural ripening do-nothing be contemplated.Cultural commencement drop be defined as the dish up through which the full potential of cultural renewing rout out be achieved for the common good. Culture is a most valuable symbol of identity and should not be lost either through assimilation or neglect. Cultural diversity brings out the uniqueness of the northern territory society (CUC107 Northern Perspectives. Cultural elaboration and change (2007). One of the unique characteristics of the responsibility that the territorial government has in conserving and developing cultural diversity springs from the narrative of the wad of the Northern filth.The earliest inhabitants of the northern territory were the endemic pile. These bulk had and still set out a rich culture and customs by which they lived. However, when the European immigrants settled in Austral ia, they sought to undermine this culture terming it as backwards. They also sought to force their own ways, which they viewed as superior. For many historic period this opinion has dictated the nature of interaction between the indigenous people and the settlers. It has also influenced public opinion as well as paramount ideologies (Eckerman T. et al 1992).Upon this background, the territorial government mustiness lean to alter this intuition and opinion that is based against the culture and custom of the indigenous people as well as the Torres-strait islander people. The long enduring opinion is squeeze and ill informed. It is full assumptions and biases that view some cultures and works as more superior than others. Cultural development begins with the understanding of the uniqueness of the self. It is the responsibility of the Northern Territory government to press understanding, acceptance interest and most of all harmonised existence among people of different cultur al affiliations. The aspiration should be for the blameless population to notify other cultures and to nurture rather than to kill diversity. The goal should also be to create a strong sense of be through culture where the population is proud of being who they are.Killing cultural diversity is tantamount to killing own individual identity. The study of culture has in some manner increase awareness among those who take time to give thought to the cognizance those studies. However the world is still at a point where the western definition of what is superior and what is mediocre is widely embraced. Against this background many cultures fuck off lost invaluable parts that were part of the whole thus bonnie diluted (Hunter, E. (1993). This presents the main challenge to the Northern Territory government in its management and development of culture.The Northern Territory government must work from a seemingly point of weakness because many of the cultural practice and customs co nsider lost so much already which substructurenot be recovered. Elements of culture such as language hold in also changed greatly. The way people talked as well as the content of these talks has changed overtime. Among the indigenous people for instance, folk tales were used to impart knowledge as well as to pass traditions from one generation to next. However folk tales have today found replacement in technology and the consequences are a lost method of passing culture to generations (CUC107 Northern Perspectives. Cultural expansion and change (2007).These are among the challenges that the Northern Territory government faces. Capitalistic ideologies and frugal power has placed some countries at a position where they can dictate the direction the rest of the world takes. This includes dominating cultures. The disadvantaged, minorities and marginalized population have little choice but to tow the line appropriately (Alder, C. 1999). economical development in the Northern Territor y, which ironically must be encouraged, can only serve to diminish any gains on the cultural diversity front. This is a challenge to the Northern Territory government cultural development plans. It is easy to see here that the sacrifices that must be made are economic prosperity or the conservation of culture. With the world being the way it is today the Northern Territory government is hard pressed to make a decision to drive economic prosperity at the outlay of culture.The Northern Territory government can however produce a win-win situation, by embracing innovative thinking to ensure sustainable development both economically and culturally.It is unfortunate that despite the fact that an opportunity clearly exists in the northern territory to develop ways of achieving sustainable cultural development, not much good seems be coming out of the processes. This can be attributed to the fact that the focus of the main stakeholders is wrong. The Northern Territory government has loud ly cited scarcity of funds as the main obstacle in achievement of sustainable cultural development. This has denied these stakeholders from seeing the other methods and avenues open to them to attempt the opportunity (Ames, R et al 1989). The Northern Territory government has tried to develop a framework upon which to build its plans. One has been the involvement of women and the aboriginal people in decision-making process. Their representation has however not always seemly which has worked against this plan.The NT government has also sought to promote culture by encouraging cultural activities like road shows and festivals especially in Darwin. These attractions have served to show window some of the diverse cultures that exist in Northern Territory. The events are more and more becoming popular though at a very slow pace.The budget for cultural development has also been increasing steadily over the past few years (Christie, M. 2000).While the efforts of the NT government t o involve the local communities especially the aboriginal and Torres-strait islander people together with women and other minority groups are laudable. This paper suggests that more can be done in order to speed up the process and consolidate gains achieved so far. Wide consultations have a way of fostering ownership. It is therefore important that the NT government taste to improve participation of the local communities in decision-making. Representation should be increased in the decision-making organ. Additionally, in order to increase coercion the NT government should develop a holistic approach that includes educating the people at all levels of the society to appreciate their cultures as well as other cultures within this society. This can be done formally in small community groups as well as through other contemporary media.Another laudable motility that should be developed further is use of cultural events and festivals. Cultural events have succeeded elsewhere as tourist attraction and consequently served to preserve the practice. In Spain bullfighting is a cultural even that is unique to this part of the world. It has gained a cult like following and has also been used as a tourist attraction. In Brazil, street carnival where people showcase there cultural dances such as samba have also become an eye catching event that is widely accepted all over the world. Similarly events could be organized regularly to showcase the NT diverse cultures.The Northern Territory should also explore the use of cultural ambassadors in other parts of Australia and the world in order to advertise the culture and to promote cultural tourism.ConclusionWhile plans are underway to confer full powers of statehood in the Northern Territory, the territorial government must increase ensure sustainable development in all areas of development. It is the responsibility of the Northern Territory government to promote understanding, acceptance interest and most of all harmonious exi stence among people of different cultural affiliations. The goal should be for the entire population to appreciate other cultures and to nurture rather than to kill diversity. Cultural diversity must never be sacrificed in the altar of economic development.ReferencesAlder C (1999) The primary art market challenges to authenticity, on-line athttp//www.aboriginalartonline.com/forum/articles6.html, (Accessed 3/2/05)Ames, R. Don Axford, Peter J. Usher, Ed Weick, George Wenzel, and John Merritt. (1989)Keeping on the land A study of the feasibility of a comprehensive wildlife harvestsupport programme in the nor-west Territories. Ottawa ON Canadian Arctic ResourcesCommittee.Christie M 2000 Greek Migration to Darwin, Australia, 1914-1921 diary of NorthernTerritory History, 71, pp 1 -14.CUC107 Northern Perspectives. Cultural expansion and change (2007). Availablehttp//learnline.cdu.edu.au/commonunits/cuc107/people/expansion.html. Accessed on 5th March 2008Eckerman T. Dowd, M. Martin, L, Ni xon R. Gray E. Chong, Binan Goonj (1992). BudgingCultures In Aboriginal Health, . Armidale NSW Printery, University Of England.. 23-58.Gavin Mooney native Law Bulletin Availablehttp//www.Austlii.Edu.Au/Au/Journals/ILB/2003/47.HtmlHunter, E. (1993). Aboriginal Health and History. violence and prejudice in remoteAustralia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne.38Martin C (1995) The Gurindji strike and land claim, chiliad Left Weekly, Online athttp//www.greenleft.org.au/back/1995/197/197p13.htm, (Accessed 15.2.05)Strelein L (2000) Aboriginal land rights in Australia, Native Title Research Unit, AustralianInstitute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra.